Haricots blancs a la tomate vs Alubia Blanca
Overall, Haricots blancs a la tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots blancs a la tomate | Alubia Blanca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 68 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 5.4 g | — |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots blancs a la tomate has 18% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 83 kcal).
- Only Haricots blancs a la tomate lists: None.
- Only Alubia Blanca lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Haricots blancs a la tomate
Eau, haricots blancs trempés* (42,6%), coulis de tomate* (5.2%), concentré de tomate* (2.9%), sel de Noirmoutier (0.5%), ail*, poivre noir*, thym*, laurier*. * Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique
Alubia Blanca
white beans, water, salt, antioxidants (e-385)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots blancs a la tomate or Alubia Blanca?
Overall, Haricots blancs a la tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots blancs a la tomate has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alubia Blanca has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.