Haricots blancs à la Tomate vs Alubia Blanca
Overall, Alubia Blanca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots blancs à la Tomate | Alubia Blanca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | — |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alubia Blanca has 27% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Alubia Blanca is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Alubia Blanca lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Haricots blancs à la Tomate
60% haricots , eau, tomate , amidon modifié de maïs, affermissant : chlorure de calcium ; oignons en poudre, extraits d'épices, oignon, d'ail, plantes aromatiques.
Alubia Blanca
white beans, water, salt, antioxidants (e-385)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots blancs à la Tomate or Alubia Blanca?
Overall, Alubia Blanca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots blancs à la Tomate has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alubia Blanca has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.