Comparison

Erdnussbutter, creamy vs Haricots blancs à la Tomate

Overall, Haricots blancs à la Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientErdnussbutter, creamyHaricots blancs à la Tomate
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 634 kcal 82 kcal
Fat 50 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 7.6 g 0.1 g
Sugars 10 g 1.1 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.8 g
Fiber 6 g 5.3 g
Protein 25 g 5.7 g
Additives02
AllergensPeanutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Haricots blancs à la Tomate has 87% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 634 kcal).
  • Haricots blancs à la Tomate has 99% less fat (0.5 g vs 50 g).
  • Haricots blancs à la Tomate has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Haricots blancs à la Tomate has 89% less sugar (1.1 g vs 10 g).
  • Haricots blancs à la Tomate has 32% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Erdnussbutter, creamy has 12% more fiber (6 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Erdnussbutter, creamy has 77% more protein (25 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Haricots blancs à la Tomate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Erdnussbutter, creamy lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Erdnussbutter, creamy

Erdnusskerne geröstet 90,9%, Zucker, ganz gehärtetes Rapsöl, Speisesalz,

Haricots blancs à la Tomate

60% haricots , eau, tomate , amidon modifié de maïs, affermissant : chlorure de calcium ; oignons en poudre, extraits d'épices, oignon, d'ail, plantes aromatiques.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Erdnussbutter, creamy or Haricots blancs à la Tomate?

Overall, Haricots blancs à la Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Haricots blancs à la Tomate has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 634 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Haricots blancs à la Tomate has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 10 g per 100 g.

More comparisons