Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate vs Kikkererwten in curry
Overall, Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots blancs à la sauce t... | Kikkererwten in curry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 118 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has 31% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 118 kcal).
- Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has 92% less fat (0.5 g vs 6.5 g).
- Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Kikkererwten in curry has 75% less sugar (1.1 g vs 4.4 g).
- Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has 12% more protein (4.2 g vs 3.7 g).
Ingredients
Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate
59,7 % haricots blancs, eau, 6,8 % purée de tomates, sucre de canne, sel marin, vinaigre, amidon.
Kikkererwten in curry
60% currysaus (water, tomatenpuree, raapzaadolie, kokosmelk (kokosnootextract, water), ui, specerijen (kurkuma, 0,4% koriander, komijn, zwarte peper, kaneel, kardemom, kruidnagel), gember, 1,2% knoflook, zeezout, chili stukjes), 40% kikkererwten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate or Kikkererwten in curry?
Overall, Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 118 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kikkererwten in curry has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.