Handroll Katsu vs Kisetsu Sushi
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Handroll Katsu | Kisetsu Sushi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 167 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans, BLÉ | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Handroll Katsu has 46% less fat (3.8 g vs 7.1 g).
- Handroll Katsu has 50% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Handroll Katsu has 19% less sugar (4.3 g vs 5.3 g).
- Kisetsu Sushi has no salt, while Handroll Katsu has 0.6 g.
- Kisetsu Sushi has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Handroll Katsu lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans, BLÉ.
Ingredients
Handroll Katsu
Riz 31,8%, eau, viande de poulet 8,8% (origine: Thaïlande*), aubergine 5,1%, chou 4,3%, vinaigre de Sakura, carotte 2,8%, sucre, farine de BLÉ (GLUTEN), vinaigre de canne à sucre distillé, tréhalose**, miso (graine de SOJA, riz, sel, Aspergillus oryzae), mirin (riz gluant, eau, alcool, riz, enzyme), sauce SOJA [eau, sel, graine de SOJA, farine de BLÉ (GLUTEN), riz, alcool], huile de son de riz, huile de SÉSAME, amidon de maïs, poivre, graine de SÉSAME blanc grillée, sel, gingembre, ail, levure déshydratée, piment de Cayenne, extrait de Kombu, algue nori séchée 0,01%.
Kisetsu Sushi
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Handroll Katsu or Kisetsu Sushi?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Handroll Katsu has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Handroll Katsu has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.