Hähnchenkrusti vs Poulet pastrami
Overall, Poulet pastrami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hähnchenkrusti | Poulet pastrami |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 122 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 20.7 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 4 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poulet pastrami has 22% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 122 kcal).
- Poulet pastrami has 63% less fat (1.5 g vs 4 g).
- Poulet pastrami has 71% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Poulet pastrami has 18% less salt (2.3 g vs 2.8 g).
Ingredients
Hähnchenkrusti
Hähnchenfleisch (91%), Hähnchenhaut (5 %), Speisesalz, Dextrose, Glukosesirup, Säureregulatoren: Natriumacetate, Kaliumlactat; Gewürze (Zwiebeln, Knoblauch, Liebstöckel), Gewürzextrakte (Lauch,Pfeffer, Knoblauch, Zwiebeln, Liebstockwurzel, Bockshornklee, Majoran, Muskat), Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Poulet pastrami
Vande de poulet 95 %, sel nitrité pour saumure (sel de cuisine, conservateur: E 250) épices, maltodextrine, bouillon, glucose. poivre, acdfants E 326 E 331, arome. stabilisants E 450, E 451, antioxydant E 301.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hähnchenkrusti or Poulet pastrami?
Overall, Poulet pastrami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poulet pastrami has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hähnchenkrusti has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.