Chicken Meatballs Italian-Style vs Poulet pastrami
Overall, Poulet pastrami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chicken Meatballs Italian-St... | Poulet pastrami |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 10.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poulet pastrami has 45% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 172 kcal).
- Poulet pastrami has 85% less fat (1.5 g vs 10.3 g).
- Poulet pastrami has 78% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Chicken Meatballs Italian-Style has no sugar, while Poulet pastrami has 0.7 g.
- Chicken Meatballs Italian-Style has 15% less salt (2 g vs 2.3 g).
- Poulet pastrami has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Chicken Meatballs Italian-Style is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chicken Meatballs Italian-Style
Chicken Raised Without Antibiotics,, Contains 2% or less of: Salt, Spices, Vinegar,, Garlic, Extract of Rosemary.
Poulet pastrami
Vande de poulet 95 %, sel nitrité pour saumure (sel de cuisine, conservateur: E 250) épices, maltodextrine, bouillon, glucose. poivre, acdfants E 326 E 331, arome. stabilisants E 450, E 451, antioxydant E 301.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chicken Meatballs Italian-Style or Poulet pastrami?
Overall, Poulet pastrami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poulet pastrami has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicken Meatballs Italian-Style has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.