Haché au bœuf vs Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten
Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haché au bœuf | Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Brate... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 248 kcal | 234 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 7 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 10% less fat (18 g vs 20 g).
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has no sugar, while Haché au bœuf has 0.5 g.
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 86% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Haché au bœuf
Viande bovine française 75%, eau, fibre de bambou, protéines de pois, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, arômes, poudre de betterave rouge, antioxydant : E301. Pourcentage de matières grasses inférieur à 20%.
Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten
Rindfleisch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haché au bœuf or Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten?
Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has fewer calories: 234 kcal versus 248 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.