Comparison

Farce De Veau vs Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten

Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFarce De VeauRinder-Hackfleisch zum Brate...
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 288 kcal 234 kcal
Fat 25 g 18 g
Saturated fat 10 g 7 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.5 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0 g
Protein 14 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 19% fewer calories (234 kcal vs 288 kcal).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 28% less fat (18 g vs 25 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 30% less saturated fat (7 g vs 10 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 90% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Farce De Veau lists: Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Farce De Veau

Viande de veau (84,5%),gras de veau (8,5%),eau,sel,vinaigre,dextrose arômes naturels,extrait d'épices,saccharose,betterave rouge,épices. Présence possible de lait,blé,soja et oeuf.

Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten

Rindfleisch

FAQ

Which is healthier: Farce De Veau or Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten?

Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has fewer calories: 234 kcal versus 288 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Farce De Veau has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons