Haché au boeuf vs Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten
Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haché au boeuf | Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Brate... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 234 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.4 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 8.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 10% less fat (18 g vs 20 g).
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 17% less saturated fat (7 g vs 8.4 g).
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has no sugar, while Haché au boeuf has 0.5 g.
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 98% less salt (0.2 g vs 8.7 g).
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
- Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Haché au boeuf
Not available.
Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten
Rindfleisch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haché au boeuf or Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten?
Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has fewer calories: 234 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.