Comparison

Haché au boeuf vs Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten

Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHaché au boeufRinder-Hackfleisch zum Brate...
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group — 1
Calories 249 kcal 234 kcal
Fat 20 g 18 g
Saturated fat 8.4 g 7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 8.7 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 14 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 10% less fat (18 g vs 20 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 17% less saturated fat (7 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has no sugar, while Haché au boeuf has 0.5 g.
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 98% less salt (0.2 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
  • Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Haché au boeuf

Not available.

Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten

Rindfleisch

FAQ

Which is healthier: Haché au boeuf or Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten?

Overall, Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has fewer calories: 234 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rinder-Hackfleisch zum Braten has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons