Comparison

Grovbrød med linfrø vs Pain du champ de maïs

Overall, Grovbrød med linfrø has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGrovbrød med linfrøPain du champ de maïs
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 253 kcal 308 kcal
Fat 5.3 g 7.6 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 1.2 g
Sugars 1.1 g 2.5 g
Salt 1 g 1.7 g
Fiber 10 g 2 g
Protein 11 g 10 g
Additives60
AllergensGluten, Sesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Grovbrød med linfrø has 18% fewer calories (253 kcal vs 308 kcal).
  • Grovbrød med linfrø has 30% less fat (5.3 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Grovbrød med linfrø has 42% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Grovbrød med linfrø has 56% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Grovbrød med linfrø has 41% less salt (1 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Grovbrød med linfrø has 80% more fiber (10 g vs 2 g).
  • Grovbrød med linfrø has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Grovbrød med linfrø lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Grovbrød med linfrø

Vann, hvetemel, sammált hvete 15 %, revet helkorn av hvete 10%, linfrø 7,4%, rugkli 5,4 %, hvetegluten, hvetekli 2,3 %, gjær, salt, sesamfrø, surdeig 0,7% (varin, samimalt rug 40 %, surhetsregulerende middel (E 270, E 260), melkesyrekultur), rapsolje, maltekstrakt (bygg), vegetabilsk emulgator (E 472e, E 471, E 322 (solsikkelecitin)), dekstrose (hvete), enzym, melbehandlingsmiddel (E 300).

Pain du champ de maïs

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Grovbrød med linfrø or Pain du champ de maïs?

Overall, Grovbrød med linfrø has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Grovbrød med linfrø has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 308 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Grovbrød med linfrø has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons