Gressin rubata aux olives vs Gressins artisanaux graines de lin
Overall, Gressins artisanaux graines de lin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Gressin rubata aux olives
Gressins artisanaux graines de lin
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gressin rubata aux olives | Gressins artisanaux graines... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 414 kcal | 416 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 13.5 g |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Blé |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gressin rubata aux olives has 24% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Gressins artisanaux graines de lin has 79% more fiber (13.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Gressins artisanaux graines de lin has 17% more protein (13 g vs 10.8 g).
- Gressins artisanaux graines de lin has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Gressins artisanaux graines de lin lists: Blé.
Ingredients
Gressin rubata aux olives
soft wheat flour (gluten), palm vegetable oil (10%), olives (6%), salt, yeast, malt wheat flour (gluten) - gmo-free ingredients, could contain traces of sesame seeds and soy,
Gressins artisanaux graines de lin
Farine de _blé_ intégrale 80 %; huile d'olive extra vierge 8 %. graines de lin 6 %, levure, sel marin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gressin rubata aux olives or Gressins artisanaux graines de lin?
Overall, Gressins artisanaux graines de lin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gressin rubata aux olives has fewer calories: 414 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gressins artisanaux graines de lin has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.