Comparison

Green pitted olives in brine vs Double Stuffed Olives

Overall, Green pitted olives in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGreen pitted olives in brineDouble Stuffed Olives
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 133 kcal 191 kcal
Fat 13.4 g 18.6 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 2.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 3.1 g 3.4 g
Fiber 3.9 g —
Protein 1 g 3.2 g
Additives22
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Green pitted olives in brine has 30% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 191 kcal).
  • Green pitted olives in brine has 28% less fat (13.4 g vs 18.6 g).
  • Green pitted olives in brine has 16% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Double Stuffed Olives has no sugar, while Green pitted olives in brine has 0.5 g.
  • Double Stuffed Olives has 69% more protein (3.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Green pitted olives in brine has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Double Stuffed Olives lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Green pitted olives in brine

Water, Green Olives (45%), Salt, Acidity Regulators : Citric Acid, Lactic Acid.

Double Stuffed Olives

Green Olives (46%), Water, Almonds (9%), Red Peppers (3%), Salt, DOU White Wine Vinegar, Acidity Regulators (Lactic Acid, Citric Acid). STUFF For allergens see ingredients in bold. OLIVE May contain olive pits or pit fragments. Reject if lid button is up before opening. Refrigerate

FAQ

Which is healthier: Green pitted olives in brine or Double Stuffed Olives?

Overall, Green pitted olives in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Green pitted olives in brine has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 191 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Double Stuffed Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons