Comparison
Grão de Bico vs Cavalas em tomate
Overall, Grão de Bico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grão de Bico | Cavalas em tomate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 117 kcal | 165 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grão de Bico has 29% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 165 kcal).
- Grão de Bico has 72% less fat (2.5 g vs 9 g).
- Grão de Bico has 70% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.3 g).
- Grão de Bico has 30% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Grão de Bico has 74% less salt (0.6 g vs 2.4 g).
- Grão de Bico has 86% more fiber (6.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Cavalas em tomate has 68% more protein (20 g vs 6.5 g).
- Grão de Bico has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Grão de Bico
Grão de bico, água, sal e antioxidante (metabissulfito de sódio).
Cavalas em tomate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grão de Bico or Cavalas em tomate?
Overall, Grão de Bico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grão de Bico has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grão de Bico has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1 g per 100 g.