Comparison

Grandes gaufres X2 vs Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln

Overall, Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGrandes gaufres X2Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 514 kcal 468 kcal
Fat 31.5 g 26 g
Saturated fat 9.3 g 8 g
Sugars 30.8 g 35 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.1 g 1.9 g
Protein 6.4 g 7.3 g
Additives04
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Lupin, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln has 17% less fat (26 g vs 31.5 g).
  • Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln has 14% less saturated fat (8 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Grandes gaufres X2 has 12% less sugar (30.8 g vs 35 g).
  • Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln has 12% more protein (7.3 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Grandes gaufres X2 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln lists: Lupin.

Ingredients

Grandes gaufres X2

sucre - farine de _froment_ - _œufs_ entiers plein air - huile de colza - _beurre_ concentré 7% (soit _beurre_ reconstitué 8,5%) - _lait_ entier - sel de Guérande.

Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln

Eier*, Zucker, Weizenmehl, Rapsöl, Butter, Puderzucker, Süßlupinenmehl, Feuchthaltemittel: Glycerin; Süßmolkenpulver, Speisesalz, Emulgatoren: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren, Lecithine (enthält Soja); natürliches Bourbon-Vanille - Aroma, Backtriebmittel: Ammoniumcarbonate. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Grandes gaufres X2 or Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln?

Overall, Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bourbon-Vanille Waffeln has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Grandes gaufres X2 has less sugar: 30.8 g versus 35 g per 100 g.

More comparisons