Gouda Holland vs Gouda Jung
Overall, Gouda Jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda Holland | Gouda Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 30.5 g | 27.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.2 g | 19.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23.4 g | 23.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda Jung has no sugar, while Gouda Holland has 4.9 g.
- Gouda Holland has no salt, while Gouda Jung has 2 g.
- Gouda Jung is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Gouda Holland
pasteurized milk, salt, lactic acid bacteria (contain milk), microbial rennet, coloring: carotenes, preservative: natamycin,
Gouda Jung
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, Starterkulturen, mikrobielles Lab.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda Holland or Gouda Jung?
Overall, Gouda Jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda Jung has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda Jung has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.