Gouda jong 48% vs Gouda Holland
Overall, Gouda jong 48% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda jong 48% | Gouda Holland |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 30.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 21.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 23.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda jong 48% has 10% less saturated fat (19 g vs 21.2 g).
- Gouda jong 48% has no sugar, while Gouda Holland has 4.9 g.
- Gouda Holland has no salt, while Gouda jong 48% has 1.7 g.
- Gouda jong 48% is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Gouda jong 48%
milk (pasteurized), salt, lactic ferments, 7% rennet (microbial),
Gouda Holland
pasteurized milk, salt, lactic acid bacteria (contain milk), microbial rennet, coloring: carotenes, preservative: natamycin,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda jong 48% or Gouda Holland?
Overall, Gouda jong 48% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda jong 48% has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda jong 48% has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.