Comparison

Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli vs LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU

Overall, Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGluten Free Organic Brown Ri...LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 350 kcal 358 kcal
Fat 2.8 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.2 g 1.1 g
Protein 7.5 g 6.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU has 46% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli has 66% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli has 13% more protein (7.5 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli

Brown rice flour. Made in Italy with EU and non-EU Rice.

LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU

Farine de maïs blanc (60%), farine de maïs jaune (29,5%), farine de riz brun (10%), eau, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli or LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU?

Overall, Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gluten Free Organic Brown Rice Fusilli has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

LASAGNE SANS GLUTEN 250g EU has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons