Gevulde paprikasaus vs Mayonaise
Overall, Gevulde paprikasaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gevulde paprikasaus | Mayonaise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 632 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 68 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gevulde paprikasaus has 88% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 632 kcal).
- Gevulde paprikasaus has 100% less fat (0.2 g vs 68 g).
- Gevulde paprikasaus has no saturated fat, while Mayonaise has 5.1 g.
- Mayonaise has 67% less sugar (3.6 g vs 11 g).
- Mayonaise has 66% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Only Mayonaise lists: Eggs, Mustard.
Ingredients
Gevulde paprikasaus
groenten 31% (ui, augurk, paprika), azijn, tomatenpuree, glucose - fructosestroop, water, gemodificeerd zetmeel, zout, specerijen, ui-extract, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat, zoetstoffen: acesulfaam-K en aspartaam**, aroma. **Bevat een bron van fenylalanine.
Mayonaise
raapolie 68%, water, azijn, vrije uitloop eigeel 6%, suiker, mosterd (water, mosterdzaden, azijn, specerijen), zout, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, natuurlijk aroma, verdikkingsmiddel: guarpitmeel, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat, antioxidant: E385, kleurstof: caroteen,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gevulde paprikasaus or Mayonaise?
Overall, Gevulde paprikasaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gevulde paprikasaus has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 632 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mayonaise has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 11 g per 100 g.