Fusilli vs Hélices vegetales
Overall, Hélices vegetales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusilli | Hélices vegetales |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 358 kcal | 362 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hélices vegetales has no sugar, while Fusilli has 3 g.
Ingredients
Fusilli
Semoule de _blé_ dur de qualité supérieure, tomate déshydratée 3%, épinard déshydraté 2%. Peut contenir des traces de soja et de moutarde.
Hélices vegetales
Pasta alimenticia de calidad superior: 100% semola de trigo duro. Pasta alimenticia compuesta al tomate: sémola de trigo duro, 3,5% de tomate deshidratado. Pasta alimenticia compuesta a las espinacas: sémola de trigo duro, 2,5% de espinacas deshidratadas. Puede contener trazas de soja, mostaza y huevo.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusilli or Hélices vegetales?
Overall, Hélices vegetales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilli has fewer calories: 358 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hélices vegetales has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.