Fuet vs Argal Fuet Iberico
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fuet | Argal Fuet Iberico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 475 kcal | 458 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 2 g |
| Salt | — | 4 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Argal Fuet Iberico has 23% less sugar (2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Fuet has 10% more protein (30 g vs 27 g).
- Only Fuet lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fuet
Viande et lard de porc, lactozuver vark se, sel, lait écrémé en poudre, dextrose, épice, arômes, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium, colorant: acide carminique, fleurs de surface: Penicillium spp, Boyau naturel comestible de porc, porc 1166 g de viande de porc utilisés pour la production de 100 g de saucisson, Une fois ouvert, il est commandé de lercon - sommer dans les jours, Conditionné so atmosphère protectrice,
Argal Fuet Iberico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fuet or Argal Fuet Iberico?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Argal Fuet Iberico has fewer calories: 458 kcal versus 475 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Argal Fuet Iberico has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.