Mini Fuet vs Argal Fuet Iberico
Overall, Argal Fuet Iberico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini Fuet | Argal Fuet Iberico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 510 kcal | 458 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 5 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 29 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Argal Fuet Iberico has 10% fewer calories (458 kcal vs 510 kcal).
- Argal Fuet Iberico has 38% less sugar (2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Argal Fuet Iberico has 20% less salt (4 g vs 5 g).
- Only Mini Fuet lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Mini Fuet
pork meat, salt, lactose (milk), dextrose, herbs, spices, antioxidant (e300), preservative (e250), starter culture, coating: sodium alginate and cellulose or edible collagen casing and cellulose, may contain traces of nuts and milk proteins,
Argal Fuet Iberico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini Fuet or Argal Fuet Iberico?
Overall, Argal Fuet Iberico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Argal Fuet Iberico has fewer calories: 458 kcal versus 510 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Argal Fuet Iberico has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.