Comparison

Mini Fuet vs Fuet

Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMini FuetFuet
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 510 kcal 421 kcal
Fat 42 g 34 g
Saturated fat 16 g 13.3 g
Sugars 3.2 g 1.4 g
Salt 5 g 3.7 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 29 g 27.5 g
Additives33
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fuet has 17% fewer calories (421 kcal vs 510 kcal).
  • Fuet has 19% less fat (34 g vs 42 g).
  • Fuet has 17% less saturated fat (13.3 g vs 16 g).
  • Fuet has 56% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Fuet has 26% less salt (3.7 g vs 5 g).

Ingredients

Mini Fuet

pork meat, salt, lactose (milk), dextrose, herbs, spices, antioxidant (e300), preservative (e250), starter culture, coating: sodium alginate and cellulose or edible collagen casing and cellulose, may contain traces of nuts and milk proteins,

Fuet

fuet extra the original rrradellas ingredients: shoulder, bacon, ham and lean pork, salt, lactose (milk), spices, antioxidant (sodium ascorbate), preservative (potassium nitrate), product subjected to desiccation, guaranteed without dyes, natural edible casing 出出 nutritional information in 100g: energy value: 1749 kl / 421 ka fats: 34,0 g, of which saturated: 13,3 g, carbon hydrates •espetec, 14g,of which sugars: 1,4 g, proteins: 27,5 g, salt: 3,5 9 casa tarradellas, s,a, n-152,km 70-cp 08503 www,cosatarradellas,es gluten free preferably consume before/lot: see container, selection charcuterie

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mini Fuet or Fuet?

Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fuet has fewer calories: 421 kcal versus 510 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fuet has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons