Fuet Extra vs Argal Fuet Iberico
Overall, Fuet Extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fuet Extra | Argal Fuet Iberico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 421 kcal | 458 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 27.5 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fuet Extra has 11% less fat (34 g vs 38 g).
- Fuet Extra has 11% less saturated fat (13.3 g vs 15 g).
- Fuet Extra has 30% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Only Fuet Extra lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fuet Extra
shoulder, bacon, amun and lean pork salt, lactose (milk), spices, antioxidant (sodium ascorbate), preservative (potassium nitrate), product subjected to desiccation,
Argal Fuet Iberico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fuet Extra or Argal Fuet Iberico?
Overall, Fuet Extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fuet Extra has fewer calories: 421 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fuet Extra has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2 g per 100 g.