Comparison

Fuet vs Argal Fuet Tradición

Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFuetArgal Fuet Tradición
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 475 kcal 430 kcal
Fat 38 g 36 g
Saturated fat 14 g 14.4 g
Sugars 2.6 g 2.5 g
Salt — 4.4 g
Protein 30 g 24 g
Additives43
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fuet has 20% more protein (30 g vs 24 g).

Ingredients

Fuet

Viande et lard de porc, lactozuver vark se, sel, lait écrémé en poudre, dextrose, épice, arômes, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium, colorant: acide carminique, fleurs de surface: Penicillium spp, Boyau naturel comestible de porc, porc 1166 g de viande de porc utilisés pour la production de 100 g de saucisson, Une fois ouvert, il est commandé de lercon - sommer dans les jours, Conditionné so atmosphère protectrice,

Argal Fuet Tradición

Varkensvlees en varkensbuikspek (voor 100 gram fuet is 159 gram vlees gebruikt), zout, lactose, melkpoeder, specerijen, dextrose, antioxidant (E-301), conserveermiddelen (E-250, E-252), culturen van melkzuurbacteriën, eetbare natuurlijke varkensdarm.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fuet or Argal Fuet Tradición?

Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Argal Fuet Tradición has fewer calories: 430 kcal versus 475 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Argal Fuet Tradición has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons