Comparison

Fuet vs Mini Fuet

Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFuetMini Fuet
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 475 kcal 510 kcal
Fat 38 g 42 g
Saturated fat 14 g 16 g
Sugars 2.6 g 3.2 g
Salt — 5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 30 g 29 g
Additives43
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fuet has 13% less saturated fat (14 g vs 16 g).
  • Fuet has 19% less sugar (2.6 g vs 3.2 g).

Ingredients

Fuet

Viande et lard de porc, lactozuver vark se, sel, lait écrémé en poudre, dextrose, épice, arômes, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium, colorant: acide carminique, fleurs de surface: Penicillium spp, Boyau naturel comestible de porc, porc 1166 g de viande de porc utilisés pour la production de 100 g de saucisson, Une fois ouvert, il est commandé de lercon - sommer dans les jours, Conditionné so atmosphère protectrice,

Mini Fuet

pork meat, salt, lactose (milk), dextrose, herbs, spices, antioxidant (e300), preservative (e250), starter culture, coating: sodium alginate and cellulose or edible collagen casing and cellulose, may contain traces of nuts and milk proteins,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fuet or Mini Fuet?

Overall, Fuet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fuet has fewer calories: 475 kcal versus 510 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fuet has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons