Fruity Souls - Erdbeeren in Vollmilchschokolade vs Mango in Milchschokolade
Overall, Mango in Milchschokolade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Fruity Souls - Erdbeeren in Vollmilchschokolade
Mango in Milchschokolade
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruity Souls - Erdbeeren in... | Mango in Milchschokolade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 514 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 9 g |
| Sugars | 56 g | 27 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mango in Milchschokolade has 50% fewer calories (257 kcal vs 514 kcal).
- Mango in Milchschokolade has 46% less fat (15 g vs 28 g).
- Mango in Milchschokolade has 52% less sugar (27 g vs 56 g).
- Fruity Souls - Erdbeeren in Vollmilchschokolade has 35% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.1 g).
- Fruity Souls - Erdbeeren in Vollmilchschokolade has 60% more protein (6.8 g vs 2.7 g).
- Only Mango in Milchschokolade lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Fruity Souls - Erdbeeren in Vollmilchschokolade
Not available.
Mango in Milchschokolade
Mango 63 %, Vollmilch-Schokolade 37 %, Kakaomasse, (Zucker, Kakaobutter, VOLLMILCHPULVER, BUTTERREINFETT, Emulgator: Lecithine (aus SOJA), Vanilleextrakt/Kakaogehalt mind. 35 %).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruity Souls - Erdbeeren in Vollmilchschokolade or Mango in Milchschokolade?
Overall, Mango in Milchschokolade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mango in Milchschokolade has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mango in Milchschokolade has less sugar: 27 g versus 56 g per 100 g.