Fruits à tartiner vs Melamangio mele essiccate
Overall, Fruits à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruits à tartiner | Melamangio mele essiccate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 68 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 78.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 13 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruits à tartiner has 81% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Fruits à tartiner has 86% less sugar (11 g vs 78.6 g).
- Melamangio mele essiccate has 46% more fiber (13 g vs 7 g).
- Melamangio mele essiccate has 19% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.4 g).
- Fruits à tartiner has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fruits à tartiner
Framboise épépinées 96%, jus de citron concentré, gélifiant : pectine de fruits, édulcorant : Sucralose
Melamangio mele essiccate
Mele Golden Italiane essiccate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruits à tartiner or Melamangio mele essiccate?
Overall, Fruits à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruits à tartiner has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruits à tartiner has less sugar: 11 g versus 78.6 g per 100 g.