Comparison

Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer vs Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch

Overall, Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFruchtjoghurt HeidelbeerStraciatella Joghurt aus Heu...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 112 kcal 90 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 2.2 g
Sugars 16.7 g 12 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 1.4 g
Protein 3.7 g 3.2 g
Additives02
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch has 20% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 112 kcal).
  • Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer has 16% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer has 23% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch has 28% less sugar (12 g vs 16.7 g).
  • Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer has 14% more protein (3.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer

Joghurt, Zucker', Heidelbeeren', schwarze Johannisbeeren', Stärke¹. ¹aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft. Auch nach dem Öffnen im Kühlschrank lagern und alsbald verzehren.

Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch

_Joghurt_, Zucker, Wasser, modifizierte Stärke, 0,5% Kakaobohnen, Stabilisator: Pektin; natürliches Aroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer or Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch?

Overall, Fruchtjoghurt Heidelbeer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Straciatella Joghurt aus Heumilch has less sugar: 12 g versus 16.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons