Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere vs Confettura extra di mirtilli
Overall, Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere
Confettura extra di mirtilli
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbe... | Confettura extra di mirtilli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 214 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 52 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has 14% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 214 kcal).
- Confettura extra di mirtilli has no fat, while Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has 0.5 g.
- Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has 13% less sugar (45 g vs 52 g).
- Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has 26% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere
Heidelbeeren* 55 %, Rübenzucker*, Geliermittel: Pektin, Zitronensaftkonzentrat* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft
Confettura extra di mirtilli
Mirtilli, zucchero, succo di limone da concentrato, gelificante (pectina), correttore di acidità (acido citrico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere or Confettura extra di mirtilli?
Overall, Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruchtaufstrich Wildheidelbeere has less sugar: 45 g versus 52 g per 100 g.