Froot loops vs Tteokbokki
Overall, Froot loops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Froot loops | Tteokbokki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 21.3 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 10.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 11 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Froot loops has 93% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 312 kcal).
- Froot loops has 54% less fat (1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Tteokbokki has no saturated fat, while Froot loops has 0.5 g.
- Froot loops has 44% less sugar (12 g vs 21.3 g).
- Froot loops has 72% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tteokbokki has 81% more protein (10.6 g vs 2 g).
- Froot loops has the better Nutri-Score.
- Froot loops is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tteokbokki lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Froot loops
Not available.
Tteokbokki
Rice, Distilled Alcohol, Rice Bran Extract, Lactic Acid, Water, Maltitol Syrup, Acetic Acid, Trisodium Citrate, Salt, Sugar, Red Pepper Powder, Maltodextrin, Modified Potato Starch, Seasoning Mix (Salt, Monosodium Glutamate, Garlic Powder, Onion Powder, Soy Sauce (Defatted Soybean, Corn Gluten), Wheat Starch, Palm Oil, Glucose, Hydrolyzed Soy Protein, Seasoned Soy Sauce (Soy Sauce (Defatted Soybean, Corn Gluten), Palm Oil, Yeast Extract, Xylose, Onion Concentrate), Black Pepper Powder, Disodium Guanylate, Disodium Inosinate, Onion Seasoning Oil, Garlic Flavored Seasoning, Garlic Powder, Yeast Extract, Natural Flavor, Silicon Dioxide, Oleoresin Paprika, Ascorbic Acid, Oleoresin Capsicum, Spicy Seasoning (Maltodextrin, Arabic Gum, Chili Extract), Black Pepper Powder. Contains Soy, Wheat, Sesame.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Froot loops or Tteokbokki?
Overall, Froot loops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Froot loops has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 312 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Froot loops has less sugar: 12 g versus 21.3 g per 100 g.