Comparison
FLCK Wheat Starch vs Froot loops
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | FLCK Wheat Starch | Froot loops |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Dioxyde de soufre | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Froot loops has 94% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- FLCK Wheat Starch has 98% less sugar (0.3 g vs 12 g).
- FLCK Wheat Starch has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Froot loops has 86% more protein (2 g vs 0.3 g).
- Only FLCK Wheat Starch lists: Gluten, Dioxyde de soufre.
Ingredients
FLCK Wheat Starch
Froment 100%
Froot loops
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: FLCK Wheat Starch or Froot loops?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Froot loops has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
FLCK Wheat Starch has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 12 g per 100 g.