Comparison
Froot loops vs Frumetta
Overall, Frumetta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Froot loops | Frumetta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Froot loops has 94% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 360 kcal).
- Frumetta has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Frumetta has no saturated fat, while Froot loops has 0.5 g.
- Frumetta has no sugar, while Froot loops has 12 g.
- Frumetta has no salt, while Froot loops has 0.4 g.
- Froot loops has 75% more protein (2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Frumetta lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Froot loops
Not available.
Frumetta
amido di frumento
FAQ
Which is healthier: Froot loops or Frumetta?
Overall, Frumetta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Froot loops has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frumetta has less sugar: 0 g versus 12 g per 100 g.