Comparison
FLCK Wheat Starch vs Kuzu
Overall, Kuzu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | FLCK Wheat Starch | Kuzu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 342 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Dioxyde de soufre | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kuzu has 75% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only FLCK Wheat Starch lists: Gluten, Dioxyde de soufre.
Ingredients
FLCK Wheat Starch
Froment 100%
Kuzu
raiz de Kuzu de agricultura ecológlca.
FAQ
Which is healthier: FLCK Wheat Starch or Kuzu?
Overall, Kuzu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kuzu has fewer calories: 342 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kuzu has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.