Fromage à pâte mole vs Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl
Overall, Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fromage à pâte mole | Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 289 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fromage à pâte mole has 22% fewer calories (289 kcal vs 372 kcal).
- Fromage à pâte mole has 29% less fat (24 g vs 34 g).
- Fromage à pâte mole has 23% less saturated fat (17 g vs 22 g).
- Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has no salt, while Fromage à pâte mole has 1.3 g.
- Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fromage à pâte mole
Not available.
Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl
pasteurisierte _Milch_, Kochsalz, Käsereikulturen, Paprika 0,6%, Zwiebeln 0,5%, Pfeffer schwarz 0,3%, Kümmel 0,2%, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Farbstoff: Paprikaextrakt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fromage à pâte mole or Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl?
Overall, Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fromage à pâte mole has fewer calories: 289 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.