Fried pork rinds vs Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack
Overall, Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Fried pork rinds
Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fried pork rinds | Golden Crunch Crispy Light S... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 552 kcal |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 57.1 g | 72.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 35% less fat (28 g vs 42.9 g).
- Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 66% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 14.3 g).
- Fried pork rinds has no sugar, while Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 0.7 g.
- Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 16% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 22% more protein (72.9 g vs 57.1 g).
- Fried pork rinds is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fried pork rinds
fried pork skins, salt,
Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack
Pork Rind, Seasoning (Rice Flour, Salt, Dextrose, Yeast Powder, Colours: Annatto bixin, Curcumin, Paprika Extract; Flavourings, Citric Acid).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fried pork rinds or Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack?
Overall, Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has fewer calories: 552 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fried pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.