Comparison

Chile lime pork rinds vs Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack

Overall, Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChile lime pork rindsGolden Crunch Crispy Light S...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 500 kcal 552 kcal
Fat 28.6 g 28 g
Saturated fat 10.7 g 4.9 g
Sugars 0 g 0.7 g
Salt 5.9 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 64.3 g 72.9 g
Additives45
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 54% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Chile lime pork rinds has no sugar, while Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 0.7 g.
  • Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 62% less salt (2.2 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has 12% more protein (72.9 g vs 64.3 g).

Ingredients

Chile lime pork rinds

Pork rind, salt, chile pepper, paprika, maltodextrin, yeast extract, citric acid, dextrose, malic acid, onion powder, tomato powder, spices, garlic powder, paprika oleoresin, distilled white vinegar, natural flavor, lime juice, lemon juice, lactic acid.

Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack

Pork Rind, Seasoning (Rice Flour, Salt, Dextrose, Yeast Powder, Colours: Annatto bixin, Curcumin, Paprika Extract; Flavourings, Citric Acid).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chile lime pork rinds or Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack?

Overall, Golden Crunch Crispy Light Snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chile lime pork rinds has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 552 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chile lime pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons