Comparison

French Fries vs Potatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à l'huile d'olive 6%

Overall, French Fries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFrench FriesPotatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 169 kcal 136 kcal
Fat 5.8 g 7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.5 g
Fiber 2.1 g 2.3 g
Protein 2.4 g 2.6 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Potatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à l'huile d'olive 6% has 20% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 169 kcal).
  • French Fries has 17% less fat (5.8 g vs 7 g).
  • French Fries has 62% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • French Fries has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Potatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à l'huile d'olive 6% is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Potatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à l'huile d'olive 6% lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

French Fries

Potatoes 88%, Sunflower Oil, Maize Flour, Potato Starch, Cornflour, Rice Flour, Broad Bean Flour, Salt, Dextrose, Stabiliser (Xanthan Gum).

Potatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à l'huile d'olive 6%

Pomme de terre préfrite 93,5% (pomme de terre, huile de tournesol), huile d'olive vierge extra 6%, sel 0,5%. Peut contenir des traces de céréales contenant du gluten, céleri, lait et dérives, fruits à coque et oeufs. Ces pommes de terre sont cultivées en France.

FAQ

Which is healthier: French Fries or Potatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à l'huile d'olive 6%?

Overall, French Fries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Potatoes RUSTIKS Cuisinées à l'huile d'olive 6% has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

French Fries has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons