Fortune cookies vs Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fortune cookies | Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 568 kcal |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 37 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 42.8 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fortune cookies has 29% fewer calories (403 kcal vs 568 kcal).
- Fortune cookies has 89% less fat (4.2 g vs 37 g).
- Fortune cookies has 97% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 19 g).
- Fortune cookies has 13% less sugar (42.8 g vs 49 g).
- Fortune cookies has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fortune cookies lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Fortune cookies
54% farine de blé, sucre, sirop de glucose, émulsifiant: lécithines (soja); huile de colza, arôme, sel de cuisine, poudre à lever: carbonates de sodium.
Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fortune cookies or Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate?
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fortune cookies has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 568 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fortune cookies has less sugar: 42.8 g versus 49 g per 100 g.