Fortune cookies vs Fortune cookies
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fortune cookies | Fortune cookies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 409 kcal |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 4.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 42.8 g | 35 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fortune cookies has 63% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.6 g).
- Fortune cookies has 18% less sugar (35 g vs 42.8 g).
- Fortune cookies has 75% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Only Fortune cookies lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Fortune cookies
54% farine de blé, sucre, sirop de glucose, émulsifiant: lécithines (soja); huile de colza, arôme, sel de cuisine, poudre à lever: carbonates de sodium.
Fortune cookies
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fortune cookies or Fortune cookies?
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fortune cookies has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 409 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fortune cookies has less sugar: 35 g versus 42.8 g per 100 g.