Fortune cookies vs Fortune cookies
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fortune cookies | Fortune cookies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 403 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 4.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 42.8 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fortune cookies has 70% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 403 kcal).
- Fortune cookies has 64% less fat (1.5 g vs 4.2 g).
- Fortune cookies has 72% less sugar (12 g vs 42.8 g).
- Fortune cookies has 60% less salt (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Fortune cookies has 68% more protein (6.3 g vs 2 g).
- Fortune cookies has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fortune cookies lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Fortune cookies
Not available.
Fortune cookies
54% farine de blé, sucre, sirop de glucose, émulsifiant: lécithines (soja); huile de colza, arôme, sel de cuisine, poudre à lever: carbonates de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fortune cookies or Fortune cookies?
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fortune cookies has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fortune cookies has less sugar: 12 g versus 42.8 g per 100 g.