Comparison

Fortune cookies vs Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate

Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFortune cookiesHazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group — —
Calories 120 kcal 568 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 37 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 19 g
Sugars 12 g 49 g
Salt 1 g 0.3 g
Protein 2 g 6.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fortune cookies has 79% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 568 kcal).
  • Fortune cookies has 96% less fat (1.5 g vs 37 g).
  • Fortune cookies has 97% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 19 g).
  • Fortune cookies has 76% less sugar (12 g vs 49 g).
  • Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate has 69% less salt (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate has 68% more protein (6.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Fortune cookies has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Fortune cookies

Not available.

Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fortune cookies or Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate?

Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fortune cookies has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 568 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fortune cookies has less sugar: 12 g versus 49 g per 100 g.

More comparisons