Fortune cookies vs Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fortune cookies | Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 568 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 37 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fortune cookies has 79% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 568 kcal).
- Fortune cookies has 96% less fat (1.5 g vs 37 g).
- Fortune cookies has 97% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 19 g).
- Fortune cookies has 76% less sugar (12 g vs 49 g).
- Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate has 69% less salt (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate has 68% more protein (6.3 g vs 2 g).
- Fortune cookies has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fortune cookies
Not available.
Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fortune cookies or Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate?
Overall, Fortune cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fortune cookies has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 568 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fortune cookies has less sugar: 12 g versus 49 g per 100 g.