Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate vs Fortune Cookies
Overall, Fortune Cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk... | Fortune Cookies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 568 kcal | 403 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 4.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 49 g | 42.8 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fortune Cookies has 29% fewer calories (403 kcal vs 568 kcal).
- Fortune Cookies has 89% less fat (4.2 g vs 37 g).
- Fortune Cookies has 97% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 19 g).
- Fortune Cookies has 13% less sugar (42.8 g vs 49 g).
- Fortune Cookies has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate
Not available.
Fortune Cookies
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hazelnut Fortune Cookie Milk Chocolate or Fortune Cookies?
Overall, Fortune Cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fortune Cookies has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 568 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fortune Cookies has less sugar: 42.8 g versus 49 g per 100 g.