Forellen-Filets vs Alaska Seelachs Mus
Overall, Forellen-Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Forellen-Filets | Alaska Seelachs Mus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 8.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Forellen-Filets has 58% fewer calories (144 kcal vs 341 kcal).
- Forellen-Filets has 83% less fat (5.6 g vs 33 g).
- Forellen-Filets has 48% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Forellen-Filets has 73% less salt (2.2 g vs 8.3 g).
- Forellen-Filets has 48% more protein (23 g vs 12 g).
- Forellen-Filets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Forellen-Filets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Forellen-Filets
Forelle, Speisesalz, Edelholzrauch. Forelle (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gewonnen aus Aquakultur in der Türkei.
Alaska Seelachs Mus
68% Alaska gesalzen, getärbt |Lactsersatz] (Alaska Seelachsfilet, Salz, branntweinessig, Konservierunqsstoft: Natriumbenzoat Raucharoma, farbstoffe: Gelborange S und Cochenillerot A), Rapsol. Kann Spuren von Krebstieren, Eiern, Soja, Milch, Sellerie und Senf enthalten. belborange S und Cochenillerot A: Kann Aktivität und Aufmerksamkeit bei Kindern beeinträchtigen. Seelachs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Forellen-Filets or Alaska Seelachs Mus?
Overall, Forellen-Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Forellen-Filets has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Forellen-Filets has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.