Forelle vs Alaska Seelachs Mus
Overall, Forelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Forelle | Alaska Seelachs Mus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 8.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Forelle has 58% fewer calories (144 kcal vs 341 kcal).
- Forelle has 83% less fat (5.6 g vs 33 g).
- Forelle has 48% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Forelle has no sugar, while Alaska Seelachs Mus has 0.5 g.
- Forelle has 73% less salt (2.2 g vs 8.3 g).
- Forelle has 48% more protein (23 g vs 12 g).
- Forelle has the better Nutri-Score.
- Forelle is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Forelle
Forelle, Speisesalz, Edelholzrauch
Alaska Seelachs Mus
68% Alaska gesalzen, getärbt |Lactsersatz] (Alaska Seelachsfilet, Salz, branntweinessig, Konservierunqsstoft: Natriumbenzoat Raucharoma, farbstoffe: Gelborange S und Cochenillerot A), Rapsol. Kann Spuren von Krebstieren, Eiern, Soja, Milch, Sellerie und Senf enthalten. belborange S und Cochenillerot A: Kann Aktivität und Aufmerksamkeit bei Kindern beeinträchtigen. Seelachs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Forelle or Alaska Seelachs Mus?
Overall, Forelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Forelle has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Forelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.