Comparison
Forelle vs Forellen-Filets
Overall, Forelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Forelle | Forellen-Filets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 144 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Forelle has no sugar, while Forellen-Filets has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Forelle
Forelle, Speisesalz, Edelholzrauch
Forellen-Filets
Forelle, Speisesalz, Edelholzrauch. Forelle (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gewonnen aus Aquakultur in der Türkei.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Forelle or Forellen-Filets?
Overall, Forelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Forelle has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Forelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.