Comparison

Focaccia Romero/Alecrim vs La focaccua

Overall, Focaccia Romero/Alecrim has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFocaccia Romero/AlecrimLa focaccua
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 271 kcal 263 kcal
Fat 7.9 g 4.8 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 0.9 g
Sugars 1.6 g 3.1 g
Salt 1.5 g 4.5 g
Fiber 4.4 g 3.3 g
Protein 7.9 g 9.4 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • La focaccua has 39% less fat (4.8 g vs 7.9 g).
  • La focaccua has 50% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Focaccia Romero/Alecrim has 48% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Focaccia Romero/Alecrim has 67% less salt (1.5 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Focaccia Romero/Alecrim has 26% more fiber (4.4 g vs 3.3 g).
  • La focaccua has 16% more protein (9.4 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Focaccia Romero/Alecrim has the better Nutri-Score.
  • La focaccua is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Focaccia Romero/Alecrim lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Focaccia Romero/Alecrim

Harina de trigo, agua, 6% queso mozzarella, aceite de nabina, aceite de girasol, levadura, preparado de vinagre de alcohol, harina de arroz, sal, sal marina, aceite de oliva virgen extra, 0,2% ajo en polvo, 0,2% romero, 0,2% tomillo, azúcar, conservador: propionato sódico, aroma.

La focaccua

Farine de blé, eau, semoule de blé dur, levain, huile d’olive extra vierge, sel, levure, farine d’orge maltée

FAQ

Which is healthier: Focaccia Romero/Alecrim or La focaccua?

Overall, Focaccia Romero/Alecrim has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

La focaccua has fewer calories: 263 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Focaccia Romero/Alecrim has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons