Comparison

Fleischzubereitung Rind vs Birne-Hagebutte

Overall, Birne-Hagebutte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFleischzubereitung RindBirne-Hagebutte
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 113 kcal 58 kcal
Fat 5.8 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.1 g 8.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0.2 g 3 g
Protein 8.7 g 0.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Birne-Hagebutte has 49% fewer calories (58 kcal vs 113 kcal).
  • Birne-Hagebutte has 95% less fat (0.3 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Birne-Hagebutte has 95% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Fleischzubereitung Rind has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Birne-Hagebutte has 93% more fiber (3 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Fleischzubereitung Rind has 95% more protein (8.7 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Birne-Hagebutte has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Fleischzubereitung Rind

Wasser, Rindfleisch 40%, Reisvollkornmehl, Rapsöl

Birne-Hagebutte

Birnen 91 %, Hagebutten 9 %

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fleischzubereitung Rind or Birne-Hagebutte?

Overall, Birne-Hagebutte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Birne-Hagebutte has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 113 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fleischzubereitung Rind has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 8.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons