Comparison

Hühnchenfleisch-Zubereitung vs Birne-Hagebutte

Overall, Birne-Hagebutte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHühnchenfleisch-ZubereitungBirne-Hagebutte
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 122 kcal 58 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.1 g 8.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 1 g 3 g
Protein 8.4 g 0.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Birne-Hagebutte has 53% fewer calories (58 kcal vs 122 kcal).
  • Birne-Hagebutte has 96% less fat (0.3 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Birne-Hagebutte has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Hühnchenfleisch-Zubereitung has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Birne-Hagebutte has 67% more fiber (3 g vs 1 g).
  • Hühnchenfleisch-Zubereitung has 95% more protein (8.4 g vs 0.4 g).

Ingredients

Hühnchenfleisch-Zubereitung

Wasser, Hähnchenfleisch* 40 %, Reisvollkornmehl* 7 %, Rapsöl* 0,8 % *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

Birne-Hagebutte

Birnen 91 %, Hagebutten 9 %

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hühnchenfleisch-Zubereitung or Birne-Hagebutte?

Overall, Birne-Hagebutte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Birne-Hagebutte has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hühnchenfleisch-Zubereitung has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 8.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons