Comparison

Filetti di alici vs Filetti di alici

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFiletti di aliciFiletti di alici
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 462 kcal 188 kcal
Fat 46 g 10 g
Saturated fat 5.2 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 9.2 g 16 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 12 g 24 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetti di alici has 59% fewer calories (188 kcal vs 462 kcal).
  • Filetti di alici has 78% less fat (10 g vs 46 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 58% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Filetti di alici has no sugar, while Filetti di alici has 0.7 g.
  • Filetti di alici has 43% less salt (9.2 g vs 16 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 50% more protein (24 g vs 12 g).
  • Only Filetti di alici lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filetti di alici

Not available.

Filetti di alici

Filetti di alici (Engraulis encrasicolus), olio d'oliva 45%, sale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filetti di alici or Filetti di alici?

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons